Bush's New US Attorney a Criminal?


Wednesday, March 28, 2007

BBC Television had exposed 2004 voter attack scheme by appointee Griffin, a Rove aide.
Black soldiers and the homeless targeted.

by Greg Palast

There's only one thing worse than sacking an honest prosecutor. That's replacing an honest prosecutor with a criminal.

There was one big hoohah in Washington yesterday as House Judiciary Chairman John Conyers pulled down the pants on George Bush's firing of US Attorneys to expose a scheme to punish prosecutors who wouldn't bend to political pressure.

griffin-caging.pngBut the Committee missed a big one: Timothy Griffin, Karl Rove's assistant, the President's pick as US Attorney for the Eastern District of Arkansas. Griffin, according to BBC Television, was the hidden hand behind a scheme to wipe out the voting rights of 70,000 citizens prior to the 2004 election.

Key voters on Griffin's hit list: Black soldiers and homeless men and women. Nice guy, eh? Naughty or nice, however, is not the issue. Targeting voters where race is a factor is a felony crime under the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

In October 2004, our investigations team at BBC Newsnight received a series of astonishing emails from Mr. Griffin, then Research Director for the Republican National Committee. He didn't mean to send them to us. They were highly confidential memos meant only for RNC honchos.

However, Griffin made a wee mistake. Instead of sending the emails -- potential evidence of a crime -- to email addresses ending with the domain name "@GeorgeWBush.com" he sent them to "@GeorgeWBush.ORG." A website run by prankster John Wooden who owns "GeorgeWBush.org." When Wooden got the treasure trove of Rove-ian ravings, he sent them to us.

And we dug in, decoding, and mapping the voters on what Griffin called, "Caging" lists, spreadsheets with 70,000 names of voters marked for challenge. Overwhelmingly, these were Black and Hispanic voters from Democratic precincts.

tim-griffin.jpgThe Griffin scheme was sickly brilliant. We learned that the RNC sent first-class letters to new voters in minority precincts marked, "Do not forward." Several sheets contained nothing but soldiers, other sheets, homeless shelters. Targets included the Jacksonville Naval Air Station in Florida and that city's State Street Rescue Mission. Another target, Edward Waters College, a school for African-Americans.

If these voters were not currently at their home voting address, they were tagged as "suspect" and their registration wiped out or their ballot challenged and not counted. Of course, these 'cages' captured thousands of students, the homeless and those in the military though they are legitimate voters.
We telephoned those on the hit list, including one Randall Prausa. His wife admitted he wasn't living at his voting address: Randall was a soldier shipped overseas.

Randall and other soldiers like him who sent in absentee ballots, when challenged, would lose their vote. And they wouldn't even know it.

And by the way, it's not illegal for soldiers to vote from overseas -- even if they're Black.

But it is illegal to challenge voters en masse where race is an element in the targeting. So several lawyers told us, including Ralph Neas, famed civil rights attorney with People for the American Way.

Griffin himself ducked our cameras, but his RNC team tried to sell us the notion that the caging sheets were, in fact, not illegal voter hit lists, but a roster of donors to the Bush-Cheney reelection campaign. Republican donors at homeless shelters?

Over the past weeks, Griffin has said he would step down if he had to face Congressional confirmation. However, the President appointed Griffin to the law enforcement post using an odd little provision of the USA Patriot Act that could allow Griffin to skip Congressional questioning altogether.

Therefore, I have a suggestion for Judiciary members. Voting law expert Neas will be testifying today before Conyers' Committee on the topic of illegal voter "disenfranchisement" -- the fancy word for stealing elections by denying voters' civil rights.

Maybe Conyers should hold a line-up of suspected vote thieves and let Neas identify the perpetrators. That should be easy in the case of the Caging List Criminal. He'd only have to look for the guy wearing a new shiny lawman's badge.
******

Read the full story, "Caging Lists: Great White Republicans Take Voters Captive" in Greg Palast's Armed Madhouse: Sordid Secrets and Strange Tales from a White House Gone Wild. The new edition, with a new chapter on Theft of the Election, will be released April 24th (by Penguin/Plume in paperback).

Catch our original BBC Television story here - on Palast's brand new YouTube channel

 
icon for podpress  Palast On Actionpoint with Cynthia Black [11:54m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

Print This Post Print This Post

7 Responses to “ Bush's New US Attorney a Criminal? ”

  1. denver car accident attorney

    great tips. I enjoyed reading this

  2. Burglar

    The truth will show,no one can escape from the law.

  3. DUI Lawyers Online

    Therefore, I have a suggestion for Judiciary members. Voting law expert Neas will be testifying today before Conyers' Committee on the topic of illegal voter "disenfranchisement" -- the fancy word for stealing elections by denying voters' civil rights.

  4. TY Freberg

    Palast seems to have missed Timothy Griffen's sly (slander: slur) reference to homeless persons being campaign contributors; the crime of the century (at least here at a place called California is the looting of wealthy (affluent) American homes. The Americans are
    accused of being guilty of owing some measly amount ($200) for
    "rent" and if not paying (at least) $180 to the state court
    within five days of the accusation issued by the CA or CA
    state court: the victim is deemed guilty of a misdeamor
    (which by law allows a fine no greater than $100)
    and a "lock-out" proceeds at the home with
    the homeowner forced to be homeless...
    For an accusation of $200 owed, attempts to 'murder identity' while
    the looters loot homes of any untold vast amount ($5-4-3-2-100,000... A million dollars; ten million dollars): a victim's entire personal/professional property, along with bank and credit
    records are seized from the person (illegal search and
    seizure).
    'Unlawful Detainer' is still happening at CA: but Dick Cheney is NOT TO BE BLAMED; George Bushs' (Jr., Sr.) ARE NOT GUILTY OF IT. Duke Cunningham agreed that the bank accounts of wealthy Republicans rendered homeless by such attacks could be considered as
    "investors": their furnishings could be sold at "auction",
    and Duke is now jailed.

  5. Muirhead

    thanks !! very instrumental post!

  6. Jane

    Nice post and blog! Greets.

  7. tampa criminal lawyer

    Oh I agree. Mukasey has convinced me that law is unimportant. And can be dispensed with for political or monetary considerations. I thank him for it.

    We in America have been hung up on this law crap for too long.

    Let's get criminal. All the better people do it. Why shouldn't the rest of us?

    Again, I find myself suggesting, beyond this sarcasm, that the best response to the government we have been given by the corporations is bloody effing revolution.

    But I wouldn't want to disturb your little ipod dreams, America.

Leave a Reply